Friday 3 October 2014

A VERY BRIEF ANALYSIS OF INDIAN AND GLOBAL BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT


No organization can live in a vacuum. This may hold true for business organizations too. When businessmen and managers talk about business environment, they usually refer to the macroeconomic environment, the quality of human resources, and the role of law, which also means an efficient judiciary, the state of the countries technological progress, supportive infrastructure and the political stability and relative policy continuity. In this essay we have used the generally accepted method to access the quality of business environment- GLOBAL COMPETITIVE INDEX which ranks 144 countries in the above mentioned parameters and many other indicators.

To present a clear picture of the global business environment we have taken about 18 countries from Asia, Australia, Europe, and the America. We have bifurcated these countries into 4 broad categories.
Categories:-
A-     Asia and Australia
B-     Africa
C-     Europe
D-     America



(Please do note that we have divided the list into 4 broad categories because of their location and our convenience and not because they share something in common even if they do share something in common)  

COUNTRY
CATEGORY
POPULATION ( MILLION)
GDP in nominal terms (BILLION)
GDP/CAPITA Growth
in USD
GDP Growth (IN %)
GCI Rank
AUSTRALIA
A
23.2
1505.3
64863.17
1.8
22
BRAZIL
D
198.3
2242.9
11310.88
2.5
57
CANADA
D
35.1
1825.1
5198.51
1.2
13
CHINA
A
1360.8
9181.4
6747.23
7.7
28
COLUMBIA
D
47.2
381.8
8097.84
4.3
66
EGYPT
B
84.2
271.4
3225.52
1.6
119
GERMANY
C
80.8
3636.0
44999.5
0.2
5
INDIA
A
1243.3
1870.7
1504.54
5
71
INDONESIA
A
248.0
870.3
3509.82
5.8
34
JAPAN
A
127.3
4904.5
38491.35
1.5
6
MEXICO
D
118.4
1258.5
10629.88
1.1
61
NIGERIA
B
169
286.5
1692.26
2.8
127
POLAND
C
38.5
516.1
13394.34
1.6
43
RUSSIA
C
142.9
2118.0
14818.64
1.3
53
SOUTH AFRICA
B
53
350.8
6620.72
1.3
56
SOUTH KOREA
A
50.2
1221.8
24328.98
3
26
UK
C
64.1
2535.8
39567.4
1.7
9
USofA
D
316.4
16799.7
53101.1
1.9
3

                                                                             
The GCI report has been based on both theoretical and empirical research on sub-indices like starting a new business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity & related infrastructure, registering property, getting credit, protecting investors, cross border trade barriers and bankrupting dealings.

What these figures show are the economy and the condition of business environment. If you have observed countries with higher GCI tend to have stronger economies, richer citizens and usually belong to the west or to the Asia-Pacific region.

Indian, South Korean and China started out in the 1950’s under similar conditions but since then, China & South Korea gradually improved their business environment we have lagged behind and in that process the country and its citizens have ended up poorer.

The world broadly has many things going in its favor at this point of time.
1.)    A revival in the world’s biggest economy- the USA.
2.)    Ascent of reasonably pro-market figures in stagnant economies of India, Indonesia & Japan- Narendra Modi,  Joko Widodo &  Shizno Abe respectively.
3.)    Chinese efforts to strengthen judicial process and reforming State Owned Enterprises through corruption crackdowns.

India has one main thing going in its favor at this point of time- A quasi-dictator in the form of Modi.

The Quasi-dictator I was just talking about......



The adverse factors for the world are listed as followed:-
1.)  The emerging threat of financial instability in China ( referring the shadow banking crisis)
2.) Fed taper (Increase in the base lending rates of the United States Federal Reserve i.e. the Fed) in the mid-term.
3.)  Emerging threat of a Brexit. ( A British exit from the Euro Zone in the coming 2016 referendum)

India has many things not going in its favor at this point of time. The biggest of these reasons is “INDIA IS INDIA- WE STILL FOLLOW THE IST (Indian standard time)’’.

Coming again to the Indian business environment Mr. Narendra Modi has declared his intent to attract more businesses to invest India and has given two very attractive slogans :-
1.)    Make in India.
2.)    No red tape, only red carpet.

Even though these are very achievable and necessary aims, they sound lofty as Mr. Modi has not shown much movement towards achieving these aims, ex- the land accusation act of 2013 passed by the UPA (which by the way noted columnists TN Ninan and R Jagannathan have famously called the UPA’s worst legacy). Cumbersome demands of the new companies act and archaic labor legislation like the Indian factories act of 1948 and Industrial disputes act 1952 and the Boiler acts.

To achieve his stated aims he has to do a lot of the above and much more but he has not shown any inclination to be India’s Reagan or Thatcher If he has to give jobs to the young Indian unemployed he will have to do many things that are un-popular in the short term. Mr. Modi being the ultimate Indian pragmatist won’t do any of those things.

As Shankar Sharma and Devina Mitra repeatedly write in the Business Standard newspaper, when compared to the other developing economies, Indian economy is much less prone to macro-economic shocks due to its low level of indebtedness among other things. But this won’t be of much use if we continue to let the socialist shackles on our economy remain by not improving upon our Global competitive index.

In the present geo-political scenario India is in a unique position to be the next manufacturing power house of the globe as traditional powerhouses like Thailand and China are suffering from political instability and lack of independent judicial system respectively. It depends upon our leaders to capitalize on this situation by increasing our competitiveness and going out of the way to attract businesses to India.

Now coming to the rest of the globe-
Economies like South Korea, Japan, and even partly China suffer ageing population, thus resulting in gradual rise of wages. This is causing a gradual loss of competitiveness when it comes to the labor competitiveness index. Countries like Russia are suffering due to the economic ramifications of the actions of their political leaders (refer Putin in Ukraine). Egypt, which is a part of Middle East is suffering due to all the above reasons AND the larger arab societal collapse due to the spread of extreme Salafism. The only countries which are poised to perform well are Poland, Nigeria, Canada, Mexico, and Columbia .While Mr. Modi may have or may turn out to be a false reformer, Donald Tusk, Good Luck Jonathon, Enrique Pene Nieto and Juan Manuel Santos (of Poland, Nigeria, Mexico and Columbia) have managed to reform their extremely static economies through increasing their business competitiveness , rather efficiently.

Joko Widodo- The New Indonesian President.


The bigger risk to the global economy is a short term shock out of the shadow banking crisis in China which will affect most economies irrespective of their competitiveness. Such a Black Swan event if it were to happen would negatively impact the slender global recovery.

To conclude in one sentence the Global and Indian economy face many hurdles in terms of business constraints which is hurting the global citizenry and the Indian citizenry and these constraints are slowly being phased out as a part of the natural evolution process of the global economy.


Bibliography :-


2) The Economist Magazine on understanding the shadow banking crisis.


By- S. Shreyas Bharadwaj, Pranav Tyagi, Sai Mourya, Naman Khandelwal, Bikramjit Singh , Ujjwal Krishna.