Analysis of the Indian National Congress's Job promise.-Part 1

The most interesting promise I saw in the INC manifesto was the Jobs promise. If you have not read the newspapers properly in the past 2 days, the promise was

'Creation of 10 crore(100 million) jobs in the next 5 years'
You may think that this promise is an excellent one and it is good to see the congresswallahs talk about India's job market.

Here is my verdict on the promise- It is nothing but a big joke. The biggest joke by any national political party ever in Independent India. These 'impotent' policy makers have done nothing but talk about labour markets in the past 10 years. The only legislation they passed related to labour markets was the NREG Act- National Rural Employment Guarantee Act- an act which has been aptly termed - A government Sanctioned Ditch Digging Programme. The SOB Rahul Gandhi counts it as his biggest achievement after RTI Act in his 'Rights-based Comprehensive Legislation Programme'. 20 billion USD has been spent on the damn thing already. And yet it created less jobs than poultry farming(poultry farming created 3.8 million jobs)!! At the same time, some estimates say that it may have killed 25 million jobs!! Is this the job creation needed in our country?? And the idiot goes on to proclaim that he will create 100 million jobs in the next 5 years.

In order to create such a large number of jobs in the country, four things are required- Infrastructure(Power,Roads/Transport and legal framework), Land( Land prices for industries in rural areas are higher than in rural USA, primarily due to RaGa's Land Acquisition Bill) , Money., Labour

So lets see how he plans to create Infrastructure- .........................................................................

He has no plan. The Border Roads organisation is outstretched( Thanks to the incredibly honest A K Anthony)-this leaves us with decreased ability to harness the hydroelectric potential of North East states and other Himalayan States.Moreover, grid connectivity has not improved as our power ministers Sushil Kumar Shinde and Jyothiraditya Scindia were too busy with ....party work.
India has the third largest coal reserves in the world and we produce less coal than the Aussies. Why?- We have an inefficient Monopoly called Coal India Limited(CIL) which the government refuses to privatize despite repeated requests from Industrywallahs and economists alike. Why doesnt the government privatize it? The answer is that CIL is and always has been a cash cow for the ruling party.
And we had to suffer from 'Jayanthi Tax' too..The fat bitch would not send out the files even after completion of the cumbersome bureaucratic process for a reason only know to her. It takes an average of 7 years for a coal mine to start operations in India-Compare this with 0.5-1.5 years in China and Australia.

Roads and other forms of transport are another BIG,  inefficient problem.They government is bent on not modernising the Indian Railways. Clearances are almost always late, and when they do come, they are unclear. The UPA has made the problem more acute than ever due to is Land Bill.

The way forward is breaking up CIL and then privatizing it, handing out road contracts to private entities under binding time frames with few extensions, placing professionals in the Power and environment ministries, ministers who do not impose extra constitutional taxes on businessmen and developing a non intrusive policy framework for Infrastructure development in this country.

Land:- Land is and always has been a controversial issue in India's politics.The government annexed land at rock-bottom rates from farmers and handed it over to industrialists and real-estate developers who have profiteered form it in a HUGE way. And then came pappu. He reversed the situation through the Land Acquisition Act and know any land acquisition has become uneconomical. 

As TN Ninan wrote in a recent column in the Business Standard “The land law stipulates that forcibly acquired land must be paid for at two to four times...market prices, in addition to other relief and rehabilitation costs. So the new law will make land acquisition next to impossible, or unaffordably expensive (which becomes the same thing) in most states.”
Ninan also points out that “land prices “ in significant parts of rural India “are higher than those in any rural area of the United States, and in almost all of Europe barring countries like Holland.”

The only solution to this mess is repealing the law in it's entirety . The playing field should be levelled. The concept of 'eminent domain' should be introduced and utilized effectively.

The other two issues- money and labour will be analysed in Part 2.

NaMo vs AK- The Political Kurukshetra- 2014

In the TV media, the only fight that seems to be happening is between is between Narendra Modi and Arvind Kejriwal. The root of AAP's hostility towards NaMo can be traced to it's electoral ambitions in and around Delhi. Western UP has a 25% muslim population, their make or break strength in Chandni Chowk and Gurgaon, the constituency of key Arvind lieutenant Ashutosh and party ideologue Yogendra Yadav respectively.

The part knew that come LS elections, they would loose a huge percentage of their vote to BJP as it would be fought on one and only one issue - Narendra Modi.

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-12-02/news/44657528_1_aap-kejriwal-narendra-modi 

Their chances of a bigger LS tally would hinge on their ability to garner the traditional anti-BJP vote- the sunni muslim vote. Yogendra Yadav sensed an opportunity to garner this vote when he conducted surveys in muslim dominated assembly constituencies and found that a lot of muslims didnt vote for AAP because they did not see it as a strong enough challenger to BJP. The solution to their problem was to attack NaMo in full media glare and make an impact on this perception. Thus Arvind who had all this while, not been to vocal in his opposition to Narendra Modi started writing letter demanding answers (answers which interestingly was already available). The BJP wallahs made a strategic mistake when they decided to ignore Arvind as a temporary urban fad. Even R Jaggannathan of Firstpost opined that NaMo should ignore Arvind by not fighting in Varnasi as it would be akin to handing over candy to Arvind and NaMo would loose a lot of time in Varnasi itself . This proved very costly to them in the long run.

Then the new-age commie decided to do a 'study tour' of Gujrath. The AAP leadership had understood that  their vote share increase will be proportional to their visibility and visibility meant effectively crafting an effective media strategy. The media obviously will lap up anything that is good for their TRPs so AK headed to Gujrath and a huge media contingent from Delhi followed. The most important part of this was these AAPwallahs getting the tactic backing of NDTV they received . NDTV at this point of time was searching for a new torch-bearer for their brand Nehruvian Socialism, and they knew that INC was a spent and if it got anything below 90 seats, the party would disintegrate rapidly. They found one in Arvind.

Their efforts produced a lot of dividends. ET and the Hindu reported how the muslim membership skyrocketed in urban and semi-urban areas.The commie then demanded an audience from NaMo despite having no appointment and made a huge fuss about not getting one. He was relishing the media glare, the visibility it brought. To an uninformed bystander, it would seem that there were only 2 contestants to the PM gaddi- AK and NaMo.

Simultaneously, the middle rung AAP leaders stormed the media studios with their blatant lies about Gujrath accompanied by snippets about true failings of the Gujrath government. To them facts did not matter, they would shout down any person opposing them by branding them as communal and fascists.It was a brilliant political strategy . They utilised NaMo's modus operandi against him and succeeded in their aims to a huge extent. What they didnt realise is that in areas other than NCR and parts of western UP, they had further divided the decisive Muslim vote and helped the BJP immensely .

Then AK travelled to Mumbai and other parts of Maharashtra but made a strategic mistake of his own. In a fund-raising function , he told his audience -

"If our government comes to power then we will set an inquiry into this. And along with media people, all will be sent to jail," .

This was the opportunity the BJP was eagerly waiting for. Arvind's comment ensured 2 things

1)The media would try to avoid a tinge of bias by giving less coverage to NaMo's huge rallys and his speeches in different parts of India. This would help slowdown the NaMo juggernaut. This effect was beneficial to the secularists.

2)  Kejriwal lost the media's goodwill and coverage considerably.

At the same time rumours began floating that AK would take on NaMo in Varnasi. The rumours were further aggravated by unclear statements by senior AAP leaders. These were deliberate and carefully worded statements aimed at regaining media interest in Kejriwal.

The commie announced this in sangh parivar's southern base of operations- Bangalore. The BJP couldnt ignore the challenge any more. There was strong consensus within the top echelons that thay needed to fight back. A lot of BJP leaders started arriving at Ahmedabad to figure out a strategy .It was ingenious and demonstrated the parivars ability to fight back.The strategy was to hit the opponent when and where they least expect it and hit hard enough to turn the tables of the debate.

Just after Arvind made the formal announcement of contest in Varnasi, NaMo made his best and hardest attack yet on AAP- making it out to be a Pakistani Agent and anti-national , while at the same time hitting the Congress where it hurts most- AK Anthony. The AK Anthony attack served a dual purpose-

1- Distracting the strategist in chief from party affairs,as he knew that a distracted, angry Anthony would not be a good strategist.

2- Continue it's strategy to woo the crucial ex-servicemen votebank.

The AK-49 jibe http://indianexpress.com/article/india/politics/modi-targets-kejriwal-ak-49-an-agent-of-pak/

served a dual purpose too-

1) It put AAP on the defensive on an issue that is dear to the urban middle class- National Pride and Security.

2)It signalled the BJP second rung leaders into action,going into attack mode, they turned the tables in such a way that the agenda would now be set by NaMo and NaMo alone.

This as expected lead to an all-out social media was with Arvind tweeting:-

'Did Modi ji call me an agent of Pakistan and AK 49? Kya PM ke daawedar ko ye bhasha use karna shobha deta hai? .....'.

He is clearly on the backfoot and desperate to find a good way to fight back. As of now it is advantage NaMo. What I am sure about is that it will be an entertaining 2 months ahead.

More Sex is Safer Sex (Part-2)

If having multiple sexual encounters can save lives, monogamy can be deadly.Consider a country like India where almost all women are monogamous but a lot of men are clearly not. These men are usually serviced by a few prostitutes or as Chanakya called them- ganikas. Considering the fact that so few prostitutes service such a numerically large clientèle, the chances of them getting AIDS is extremely high and the industry being a banned and unregulated one-the chances of these ganikas spreading it is even higher-anybody who is serviced by her after she had got HIV is sure to get it.

Well, there are 2 solutions to this problem and both involve discarding our Victorian morality.
1) If as many monogamous women as the number of men who are not monogamous decide to take atleast one extramarital partner, the requirement for common prostitutes will go down drastically however niche businesses will survive. We as a society are still too intolerant towards logic and rationality to use this solution and this solution itself might be too impractical in the short-term. Therefore, I dont think it will be acceptable.

2) We as a society and our government has to discard Victorian Law about prostitution and make the oldest profession in the world legal. We should listen to Chanakya when he says in the Arthashastra that the state should control the prostitution industry and earn revenue out of it. You might be wondering why I subscribe to this thought of Chanakya despite my long-standing belief in the principle ' The Government has no business to be in business'. The reason I believe that prostitution is an exception is that it has far too many ramifications on the health of the people.
How would state control of the prostitution industry prevent AIDS from spreading?  
Just state control wont have a favourable effect for the society as a whole although it will be favourable to the prostitutes. The state control should be accompanied by daily HIV testing, testing for other STDs and also record keeping of all the customers. This allows the health authorities to track down those who might be infected with a high level of accuracy .

Though the second solution  will garner a vocal initial opposition, it is the more acceptable of the two ideas.

To a person with a basic knowledge of the theory of demand and supply, it is clear why people with a limited sexual history/past supplies so little sex- their services is under priced.If only such people can easily advertise their histories, HIV concious mates would find them an attractive prospect, but unfortunately it is not possible.
Such people raise the standard of the partner pool just by entering it and reckless people (like Rahul) will lower the standard by entering it.Like in any necessary programme's implementation- there are too many Rahuls and too few Narendras.

The challenge for our society in the face of the AIDS pandemic is to wean the Narendras away from celibacy and/or porn sites and coerce them into performing roles required of them in this fight to prevent the spread of AIDS . I have not been able to think of a plausible solution to this problem .If you ever figure out a solution please write to me about it..

Thank you for reading this post.

More Sex is Safer Sex (Part -1)

Well, you might be wondering why a 17 year old boy is writing about a subject which is 'taboo' in our society - 'sex'.... Some of you might be fuming about the extent of 'moral degradation of our society' . Example:- The principal of my school, a few devout christians, most of the muslims, a majority of the Modibots, a lot of AAPtards ,etc. My only request to such people- complete reading this post and then start filling the comments section with abuses.

It is true: AIDS and other STDs are nature's retribution towards our tolerance of immoderate and socially irresponsinble behaviour. It is the price we pay due to our permissive attitudes towards monogamy, chastity and other forms of illogical sexual conservatism.

The Bible, the Koran, the Manusmriti tells you about the sin of promiscuity. Here I will explain to you the sin of self-restraint.

Consider Narendra, a charming and prudent fellow with a limited sexual history. Over the past few weeks, he has been gently flirting with a co-worker Jayalalitha and both of them have entertained the prospect of going home together after the weekend office party. However on the morning of the office party, Narendra sees an advertisement about the virtues of Self restraint/ abstinence. Chastened, he goes home. Now in Narendra's absence, Jayalalitha hooks up with an equally charming but considerably less prudent Rahul- and Jayalalitha gets AIDS.

So when the pious Narendra withdraws from the mating game, it makes it easier for reckless people like Rahul score a sixer in the game. The ads are more effective with Narendra than with Rahul. The ads are infact a danger to Jayalalitha's safety....
The self-restraint ads if they would have replaced an ad of say- Skore Condoms, it would mean a bigger loss to society.

If the Narendras of the world loosen up a little, we can slow the spread of AIDS and other STD's and also help the economy in many ways:-
1) People like him buy condoms- a lot of jobs are created in condom production.
2) The cost of treatment would go down allowing for greater money supply into the market= greater investment= more jobs.( the current societal  cost of AIDS in India is near 10,000 crore INR and is expected to be 45,000 crore INR in 2017)

A cautious guy like Narendra does the world a favour every time he is on the prowl for a mate. In fact, he does the world 2 favours:
1) The office party scenario I mentioned earlier , would be prevented and he would have saved Jayalalitha's life.
2)If he sleeps with an infected partner he would get AIDS, sulk at home for the rest of his life and 'Die'. The important thing to be noted here is -  He doesnt infect anyone else and the virus dies with him. It would have been an entirely different case with Rahul.

This post will be continued tomorrow. Hope you enjoyed reading it!!!